| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130819 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 17 '21 at 15:03 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61%
Good
|
68% 120 Pts
|
37% 284 Pts
|
20% 317 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3.31%
Terrible
|
3% 2.9 fps
|
3% 4.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 177 80 69 76 8.8 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
44% 194 MB/s
|
40% 9.9 MB/s
| |
|
ST4000VX 007-2DT166 4TB
730GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 27 26 26 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
36% 26.5 MB/s
|
84% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS512MLK64V6N 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
45% 89.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 709 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 396x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 104x |
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 58x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 56x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $722 |