Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Q1900M  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 51.5
29% 42.4 Pts
4-Core 83
8-Core 85.6
12% 84.3 Pts
64-Core 100
7% 100 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 191 199 194 184 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 198
Write 155
Mixed 177
SusWrite 188
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 15.7
58% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 151
119% 164 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 129%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12.8
8% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback