Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9150e 947 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 52.6 28% 42.7 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 103 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3759) 2GB CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 20.2 Parallax 25 20% 23.3 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 25.9 Splatting 18.7 19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 866GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 170 206 208 215 217 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 158 Write 95.3 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 191 30% 131 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 10.5 44% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 10.1 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 12.8 10% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 18%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

SSD
Vector 180 480GBOCZ $140Bench 91%, 1,103 samples	1x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16