Asrock H61M-VS.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VS. (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 119 56% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3649) 2GB CLim: 1437 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.5 Reflection 24 Parallax 18.5 18% 21.3 fps	MRender 26.9 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 18.5 19% 24 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Generic S050 Hard drive 500GB 636 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA7M0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 99 102 104 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 68 Write 98.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 96.3 51% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 113GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 84 83 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 106 Write 80 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 81.3 54% 74 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 1,270 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.1% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	11x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	10x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	9x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x
120GB 120GBMidasforceBench 63%, 636 samples	3x
TS128GSSD360S 128GBTranscendBench 61%, 775 samples	2x

RAM
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $96

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16