Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 04:19
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 444
61% 451 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.43 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 284 79 67 81 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 432
Mixed 371
SusWrite 158
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64.3
212% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 111%
Great: 131%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
650GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 118 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 122
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
95GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 87 89 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 156
Write 156
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 89.1
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 21 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 116
Write 39.8
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 15.2
62% 56 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.6
218% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
49GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 30 25 28 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 127
Write 61.1
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 33.5
84% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.7
144% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback