Asrock X570 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 00:48
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 177
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 542
48% 405 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 8495) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 76.5
46% 71.6 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 53.7
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280Q4 1000GB
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP112PJ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2586 2235 911 909 924 927 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,047
Write 1,633
Mixed 9
SusWrite 1,415
232% 1,026 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 544
434% 619 MB/s
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 53.1
164% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 177% Great: 526%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
370GB free
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1241 467 468 473 500 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,105
Write 887
Mixed 152
SusWrite 598
204% 935 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 55.8
178% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 460
358% 503 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 200%
Great: 380%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 160 155 160 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 151
Mixed 76
SusWrite 158
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 133 135 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 134
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 175 180 176 180 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 136
Write 158
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 179
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
370% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
598GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 146 143 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 154
Write 148
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 145
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 39.6
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 32
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,205
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback