Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2637M 599 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 103 49% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 156 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 052E) 1.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.77 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 1.4 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB 4,013 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: VZDB SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 352 305 377 364 326 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 368 Write 312 Mixed 241 SusWrite 342 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 10.6 38% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 116 98% 145 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HT2SCRCH 2x2GB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.2% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2467MIntelBench 45%, 4,235 samples	63x
Core i7-2637MIntelBench 51%, 599 samples	26x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	89x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	21x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	18x
LMT-128M3M 128GBLiteonitBench 64%, 542 samples	12x

RAM
HT2SCRCH 2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 663 samples	86x
M7B73H-H 2x2GBSamsungBench 40%, 42 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16