Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 117
55% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 333
29% 249 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 63.2
53% 66.3 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 55.6
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 91 90 94 102 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 353
Write 351
Mixed 290
SusWrite 97.8
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 16.5
63% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 177
142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
109GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 277 291 257 296 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 441
Write 404
Mixed 398
SusWrite 292
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 29.7
98% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 16.2
80% 181 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
773GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 195 192 197 191 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 15.2
Write 76.3
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 189
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
189GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 58 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 53.6
Write 55.1
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 57
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback