Intel H55

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	9.96% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel H55 (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20161209
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 15 '21 at 09:31
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 L 620 387 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 28.6 1-Core 7.3 2-Core 12.2 13% 16 Pts	4-Core 19.6 8-Core 25.5 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 22.6 1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E104) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 11 Parallax 4.9 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 7.4 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 39 37 33 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.96% Terrible	Read 64.7 Write 30.4 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 35 12% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4.4 17% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 317GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 40 37 37 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 87.7 Write 110 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 36.3 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 70%
Seagate ST96812AS 60GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 8GB free Firmware: 3.14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 4.3 4.2 4 5.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 23%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 4.1 4.5 4.1 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4.1 7% 6.95 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 0, 0 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 263 15% 263 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	639x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	241x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	218x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	441x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	298x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	176x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	97x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	73x
RZX-19SSD6G/120GB 120GBBench 66%, 43 samples	52x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1,138x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	304x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	259x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16