Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '21 at 22:28
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 56.8 27% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 184 18% 147 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 74%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 130 25 119 78 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 180 Write 168 Mixed 152 SusWrite 91.6 110% 148 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 3.6 558% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16