Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 183
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 414
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 6.9
5% 25.4 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 141
Mixed 188
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 25
106% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 87.6
85% 137 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$92
917GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1017 1566 1401 1453 1429 1427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,682
Write 1871
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 1,382
358% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 57.6
186% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 305
327% 550 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 240%
Great: 410%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 93 94 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 91.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 91.8
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 79%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 123 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 124
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 67%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 117 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 121
Write 106
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 114
139% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
304% 3.33 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
352% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
781GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 92 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 181
Write 92
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 92.3
133% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback