Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 861
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 108
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 110
88% 105 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 114
Splatting 95
97% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 258
Write 359
Mixed 254
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 15.7
74% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 99.3
97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
106GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 201 201 205 206 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 459
Write 206
Mixed 191
SusWrite 198
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 11.9
68% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 75.4
84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 78%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
290GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 604 610 608 607 608 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,422
Write 2,272
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 886
392% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 89.6
298% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,263
953% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 301%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
554GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 111 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 162
Write 145
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 112
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 25.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback