Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200203
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 222
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 623
69% 544 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Asus(1043 1B2F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.7
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 16.7
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 337 288 288 266 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,165
Write 1,222
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 296
210% 937 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 63
214% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 715
547% 744 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 165%
Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
509GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 62 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 69.3
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 63.3
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 25.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 23.8
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback