Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 14 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 86.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 567 66% 511 Pts	64-Core 704 44% 704 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Zotac(19DA 2617) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 205 Parallax 198 176% 206 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 152 Splatting 135 128% 160 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Allied 128GB 128GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW190712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 58 44 46 50 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 369 Write 213 Mixed 218 SusWrite 54 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 14.7 96% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 6.9 45% 109 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 87%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 597GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.2% Poor	Read 41.4 Write 41.4 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 42 9% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 14.5 47% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 15.3 15% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 99%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 146GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 85 85 85 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 134 Write 116 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 85.1 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.27 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 23%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 457GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 42 41 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 36.1 Write 37.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 41.2 50% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 64%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 99 100 99 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 111 Write 94.9 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 99.1 124% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-131.A00G 2x16GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 26.9 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 25.1 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	357x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	285x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $271

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16