Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DA
Memory	6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '21 at 04:57
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 23.9 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 138 38% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 389 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 58.3 4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 874GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 55 59 62 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 44.8 Write 70.7 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 60 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 79%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 12 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.79% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 13.8 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 12.3 20% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 82% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.79% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 12GB 748 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.3 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10.5 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 293 14% 293 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	190x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	80x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	33x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	190x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	80x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	33x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	118x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	27x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	25x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	79x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	74x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16