HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120620
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 144
62% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 257
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 257
17% 257 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 75%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 75 71 55 88 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 43
SusWrite 72.2
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Smart SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 5,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback