Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8300-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 414
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 41.9
31% 41 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 33.4
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 103 96 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 175
Write 135
Mixed 175
SusWrite 90.9
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 35.5
127% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.6
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 116
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
134GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 86 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46% Average
Read 75.9
Write 73.7
Mixed 62
SusWrite 84.1
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 993GB
729GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 85 86 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 78.8
Write 75.7
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 83.6
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback