Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 170 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 474 47% 385 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 17 Parallax 10.9 7% 12.1 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 10.6 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-256 256GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: VRDC Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 220 Write 158 Mixed 176 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 23.2 81% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 110 96% 142 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 877GB free Firmware: CC44 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 192 Write 93.9 Mixed 84.3 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 34.2 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16