Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$101 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 453 51% 402 Pts	64-Core 607 38% 607 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3354) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.3 28% 12.5 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 21.4 21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 91 111 26 54 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 469 Write 372 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 102 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 92%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 385GB free Firmware: 2AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 6.7 7.6 17 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 3 SusWrite 10.8 4% 5.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 50%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 61GB free Firmware: BF100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 63 63 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 64.5 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 63.2 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB 12,603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 23.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	23x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $320

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16