| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Pro 3400 Series MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Foxconn 2ABF |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120214 |
| Uptime | 2.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 13 '21 at 20:08 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58%
Above average
|
66% 111 Pts
|
22% 163 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2ABF) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
0.89%
Terrible
|
1% 1.03 fps
|
1% 1.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 118 113 116 119 115 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
140% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
40% 55.1 MB/s
|
99% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RMR5030MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.3%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
25% 8.87 GB/s
|
58% 69.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Pro 3400 Series MT Builds (Compare 534 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Pro 3400 Series MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 158x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 143x |
| Pentium G630Intel $37Bench 47%, 12,397 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 287x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $198 |