Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 114 56% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 322 33% 268 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 96 61 56 57 57 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 234 Write 230 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 81.3 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 17.3 63% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 99.8 99% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 82%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 118 114 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 118 Write 103 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 116 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AXIOM MEMORY 4x4GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.8% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x
GeForce 7300 LENvidiaBench 0%, 202 samples	1x
Radeon HD 3470ATIBench 1%, 702 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
51264Y133I 0702 51264Y133I 00CE000080CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 00CE000080CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 12GBUnknownBench 42%, 3 samples	2x
HMT125R7BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 25 samples	1x
M391B5273CH0-YH9 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 40 samples	1x

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16