Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180131
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 13 '21 at 01:39
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 1,015 90% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,405 87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3657) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 122 Parallax 140 111% 133 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 105 Splatting 91.3 90% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 107 109 100 138 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 472 Write 123 Mixed 315 SusWrite 129 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 39.7 155% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 202 175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 91%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 747GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 168 183 133 185 184 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 141 Write 178 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 158 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 41.7 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 32 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 28.6 88% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	37x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	15x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBKingston $53Bench 108%, 30,265 samples	7x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16