Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory13 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 124
59% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 400
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 402
27% 402 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 12.5
0% 7.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 8.6
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$69
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 110 118 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 85
Write 20
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 115
44% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$65
916GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 111 112 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 100
Write 114
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 112
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 77%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 9.7 9.9 9.7 9.7 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 9
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 9
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
8GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.7 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 12
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 9.9
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
157% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback