| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME X570-PRO |
| Memory | 28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190801 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 12 '21 at 16:24 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
86% 161 Pts
|
92% 757 Pts
|
85% 1,379 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
108%
Outstanding
|
109% 133 fps
|
112% 141 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 55 53 55 55 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
20% 90.4 MB/s
|
91% 35.1 MB/s
|
81% 118 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 131 131 131 132 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
179% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
353GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 82 86 87 83 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
49% 66.1 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.6%
Very good
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
62% 21.6 GB/s
|
42% 95.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 75x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $647 |