Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 09:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 376
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 208 211 214 201 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 241
Write 231
Mixed 224
SusWrite 207
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 24.2
85% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
38GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 214 217 217 215 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.8% Good
Read 242
Write 234
Mixed 242
SusWrite 214
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 37.6
115% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
771GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 113 114 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 89.2
Mixed 64
SusWrite 112
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5403-428.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback