Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Memory 17.1 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 92.8 27% 52 Pts	4-Core 59.8 8-Core 89.6 9% 74.7 Pts	64-Core 69.7 4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 2.2 2% 2.2 fps	Splatting 3.7 4% 3.7 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB NS550-2242 128GB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 114 162 34 66 46 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 189 Write 179 Mixed 175 SusWrite 99 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 9.2 45% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 36.2 49% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 342 12% 342 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16