Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 14:53
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 453
62% 453 Pts
64-Core 448
30% 448 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 37.5
30% 38 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38
Splatting 26.7
31% 34.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 398 413 419 421 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 478
Write 412
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 378
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 6.3
94% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 0.7
72% 169 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$144
896GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 455 476 484 486 486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 480
Mixed 454
SusWrite 463
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 60.9
201% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 365
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 128%
Great: 137%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$146
233GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 107 106 104 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 105
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown NMUD480E85-3000D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 40,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $503
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback