Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$467
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,045
99% 797 Pts
64-Core 2110
142% 2110 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.81
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.1
36% 41.7 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 27.9
34% 36 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$144
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 1477 1481 1505 1509 1505 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,592
Write 2,510
Mixed 1,639
SusWrite 1,524
463% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 92.8
304% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,283
DQ Write 1080
DQ Mixed 1,188
888% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 344%
Great: 380%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
354GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 1068 1065 1058 761 537 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 937
Mixed 926
SusWrite 926
221% 984 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 81.2
281% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 275
314% 536 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 219%
Great: 300%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$239
734GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 486 386 377 376 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 482
Mixed 326
SusWrite 414
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 41.3
146% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$290
453GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 131 133 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 99.2
Write 116
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 128
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$220
74GB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 86 88 89 84 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 96%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$220
13GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 36 84 84 86 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 96%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$220
62GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 85 87 88 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$150
125GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 82 83 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 64
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 78.5
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.4
188% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$150
436GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 83 87 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 50.4
Write 74.9
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 87.9
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
218GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 109 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 109
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 108%
JetFlash TS512MJFV20 1GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.53% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.6
6% 5.38 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
59% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 5%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
437GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 35.6
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 36
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FB BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FB 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 31
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 28.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 18,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $258

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback