Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM2/AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 87.1 1-Core 49 2-Core 96.6 51% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 95.6 8-Core 96.3 13% 95.9 Pts	64-Core 97 6% 97 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX 3,983 User benchmarks, average bench 8% EVGA(3842 C879) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 4.1 9% 9.2 fps	MRender 9.3 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 4.5 6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 161 74 103 73 97 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.7% Above average	Read 258 Write 186 Mixed 214 SusWrite 113 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 24.5 97% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 1.1 44% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 85%
WD WD3200JB-00KFA0 320GB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 171GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 30 31 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 28.6 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 29.5 21% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	2x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16