Asus B75M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B75M-A (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2550K-$119 2,925 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 96.5 1-Core 13.8 2-Core 54.3 42% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 51.6 8-Core 28.7 6% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 34.1 2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 15.4 14% 16.2 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 15 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM07.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 90 94 91 98 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 455 Write 96.8 Mixed 135 SusWrite 90.5 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 18.9 72% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 86 DQ Mixed 63.5 60% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53 3,965 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 350GB free Firmware: 3.AEG SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 66 68 69 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 65.6 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 65.8 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 43%
Intenso Rainbow Line 64GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 60GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.9 7.2 3.7 7.2 7.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 6.2 15% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB 12,839 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 1.8 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 52.2 77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	108x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	88x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	53x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16