User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 06:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 93.3
39% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 179
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 33.7
0% 20.5 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 77 96 98 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 73
SusWrite 73.7
67% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 CT51264BA1339.M16F CT51264BA1339.M16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback