| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150812 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | May 09 '21 at 23:26 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
56% 85.3 Pts
|
30% 237 Pts
|
20% 320 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
50% 66 fps
|
51% 63.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 383 416 414 424 411 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
93% 415 MB/s
|
118% 41.6 MB/s
|
160% 221 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
617GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 138 137 137 135 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
82% 114 MB/s
|
158% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.1%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
63% 63.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M52BC_M32BC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples | 31x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 14x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $42 |