Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 09 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 195 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 470 50% 401 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 31.6 20% 27.2 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 24.1 20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 339 307 217 227 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 200 Write 350 Mixed 223 SusWrite 283 60% 264 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 28.6 100% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 39.7 40% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 104%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 98.2 Write 41.3 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 134 61% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 26.1 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 29.9 21% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.8 274% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB 327 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	45x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	42x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 327 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16