Asrock N68-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Memory 2.19
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 56.4
14% 28.5 Pts
4-Core 69.1
8-Core 84.7
10% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 85.7
6% 85.7 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 306.97
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 14 48 29 30 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14% Very poor
Read 47.6
Write 52.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 44.4
10% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 14.4
27% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 14%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.8 GB/s
Latency 483
8% 483 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N68-S Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback