MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C08
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200106
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	May 09 '21 at 18:33
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989 11,853 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 121 2-Core 220 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 857 79% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,250 77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Nvidia(10DE 13A1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 135 Parallax 142 112% 138 fps	MRender 164 Gravity 125 Splatting 97.6 102% 129 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 395 418 428 422 425 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 363 Write 385 Mixed 340 SusWrite 390 84% 369 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 32.2 125% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 166 155% 235 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 102%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 173 176 176 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 165 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 174 99% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB 21,064 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.6% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 19.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 15.8 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,524x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	506x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	415x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	490x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	394x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	300x

SSD
SSDPEKNW256G8 256GBIntelBench 119%, 1,046 samples	157x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	110x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	86x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	336x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	211x
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	122x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16