Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$390
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 986
94% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,550
104% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 144
Parallax 176
94% 145 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 119
Splatting 95.7
96% 110 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 95%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 211 218 189 202 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 1345
Mixed 296
SusWrite 262
132% 583 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 77.7
260% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 859
695% 989 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 161%
Great: 323%
Kingston A400 480GB-$55
21GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 115 113 76 103 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 236
Write 106
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 166
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.8
55% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 15
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 102%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$35
91GB free
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 276 275 272 271 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,922
Write 1,357
Mixed 935
SusWrite 307
250% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.4
260% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 1,073
849% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 232%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$80
220GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 91 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.2
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 92.1
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$19
251GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 100
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 100
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 37.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 37.5
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 63,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,242
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback