Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 14:40
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 448
51% 390 Pts
64-Core 438
29% 438 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E50 800A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0529A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 408
Write 274
Mixed 341
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 9.5
63% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.6
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 31.9
71% 139 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 7,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop 74%
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $255
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $293Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback