Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 10:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 195
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 353
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 356
24% 356 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 38.3
30% 39.1 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.7
31% 34.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 373 368 364 366 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 375
Write 343
Mixed 294
SusWrite 358
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 25.4
101% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 263
220% 319 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$45
727GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 178 181 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 60.2
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 176
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$92
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 13.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 21.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback