PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191017 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '21 at 10:50 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$63
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 373 368 364 366 364 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
727GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 178 181 174 174 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.5%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 124x |
Core i5-8400Intel $140Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 79x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 62x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 51x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 39x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |