Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive466% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210408
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 08:48
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 335
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 928
95% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 9.3
6% 6.7 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 0.1
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1328 3872 3881 3890 3962 3876 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
466% Outstanding
Read 2,200
Write 3,501
Mixed 2,306
SusWrite 3,468
652% 2,869 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 92.5
334% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,674
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,524
1,110% 1,456 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 466%
Great: 491%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
603GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 105
Write 90.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 72.5
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
639GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 105 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 108
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 105
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 101%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
101GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 18.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 22
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
128% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
39GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 20.6
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 22.8
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.6
206% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd GP-ARS16G44 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4389 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 31.4
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 36.3
103% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback