Asus M51BC

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '17 at 04:38
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 119 57% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 358 36% 291 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.5% Excellent	Lighting 98.4 Reflection 111 Parallax 96.8 80% 102 fps	MRender 97.3 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 102 81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33110RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 24 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1835027 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 43 26 317827579961 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 25770393609 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 614 (EA) Unknown 100 100 714 (F1) Unknown 253 253 685 (F2) Unknown 253 253 88 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	62% Good	Read 504 Write 343 Mixed 445 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 7.15 53% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 3.72 36% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 127 127 25789399339 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 957 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 943 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 957 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 957 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 210454511654 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 177 Mixed 179 137% 182 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.25 111% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID ab26 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 93.9 Write 119 Mixed 50.1 111% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 3.88 4K Mixed 0.36 148% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 3,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 11.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	97x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	12x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16