Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 204 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 653 61% 508 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 838C) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 17 Parallax 3.1 8% 9.93 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 11 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 89 82 96 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 115 Write 123 Mixed 127 SusWrite 87.3 26% 113 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 17.3 60% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 108 82% 108 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.5% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 26 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 19.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16