Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 528
64% 481 Pts
64-Core 583
39% 583 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 50.1
46% 54.9 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 47
41% 47.3 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$71
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 842 843 826 545 507 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2008
Write 1795
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 779
349% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.5
206% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,152
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 972
730% 982 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 236%
Great: 290%
Toshiba MD05ACA800 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 227 231 228 225 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 27.2
Write 167
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 228
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 73%
Great: 132%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 125 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 31
Write 124
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 126
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 106 110 100 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 80.5
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 110
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 111%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
932GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 114 112 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 114
133% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.5
226% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Panram W4U2666PS-8GC19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $328
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $277Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback