| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170718 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 08 '21 at 15:06 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.4%
Good
|
66% 118 Pts
|
48% 382 Pts
|
29% 470 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
27% 36.1 fps
|
27% 33.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 211 196 187 175 163 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
81% 360 MB/s
|
146% 49.1 MB/s
|
267% 358 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
126GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
47% 63.1 MB/s
|
177% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$5
15GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
|
6.56%
Terrible
|
21% 16.5 MB/s
|
20% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
76.2%
Very good
|
80% 27.8 GB/s
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 67x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 64x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |