MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 874
85% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 51
Parallax 42.6
35% 45.6 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 40.6
36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1840 867 827 828 827 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2,077
Mixed 1,688
SusWrite 1,002
406% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 72.8
241% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 466
418% 653 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 269%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$149
947GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 464 463 464 464 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 461
Mixed 440
SusWrite 464
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 345
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 29
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback