| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock B360M IB-R1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190319 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 08 '21 at 00:36 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
88% 157 Pts
|
73% 572 Pts
|
41% 662 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
64.2%
Good
|
69% 78.8 fps
|
54% 66.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 48 9.6 73 95 19 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
49% 218 MB/s
|
104% 39.4 MB/s
|
116% 137 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
93GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 142 140 142 146 145 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
216% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
WD Game Drive 4TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 37 38 37 MB/s
|
22.2%
Poor
|
47% 34.6 MB/s
|
122% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.5%
Very good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
64% 62 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B360M IB-R1 Builds (Compare 2,588 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B360M IB-R1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 874x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 848x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 510x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 570x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 460x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 442x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 119% - Outstanding | Total price: $302 |