Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210125
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 07 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 63.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 270 86% 161 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 693 73% 585 Pts	64-Core 831 51% 831 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 69 Parallax 112 65% 87 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 42.3 29% 34.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 75 45 45 80 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11% Very poor	Read 118 Write 100 Mixed 10.4 SusWrite 69.5 17% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 3.8 6% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 102%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 37 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 39.3 Write 37.4 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 37.4 50% 37 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 1.2 374% 5.27 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.1 DQ Mixed 1.2 387% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 14,281 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.5 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	554x
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	326x
Core i7-11700KIntel $270Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	299x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	452x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	290x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	169x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	85x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	83x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	82x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16