MSI X58A-GD65 (MS-7522)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7522
Motherboard	MSI X58A-GD65 (MS-7522) (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100728
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	May 07 '21 at 13:52
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 162 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 462 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 608 38% 608 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 75GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 224 228 55 7.3 7.3 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45% Average	Read 244 Write 226 Mixed 226 SusWrite 126 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 17.6 65% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 34.3 64% 125 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 15GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 224 56 7.3 7.2 7.4 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.6% Average	Read 244 Write 230 Mixed 224 SusWrite 88.5 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 17.6 67% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 34.9 71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 92%
Marvell Raid VD 0 1TB 567 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 12 14 18 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 13.8 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 132%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 26.3 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 26.1 32% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58A-GD65 (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58A-GD65 (MS-7522)

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	46x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	12x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	6x

SSD
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	5x
L5 LITE SSD 240GBTeamBench 71%, 893 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x
18GBUnknownBench 42%, 8,131 samples	10x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16