HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 08:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$298
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 399
54% 393 Pts
64-Core 397
27% 397 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.84
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 2.1
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 108
Write 52.8
Mixed 50.3
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback