Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 23:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 25
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 45.2
18% 29.5 Pts
4-Core 91.6
8-Core 234
18% 163 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 21%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.8% Above average
Lighting 78.7
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 68.7
64% 67.5 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 36.8
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 120 103 144 251 214 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 918
Write 70.7
Mixed 116
SusWrite 179
69% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 2.3
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 214
146% 174 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 277%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: 14244514
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 44 63 66 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 89.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 63.6
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
30GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.9 6.7 7.5 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.4
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.98 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback