Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 24.2 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 118 36% 69 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 360 35% 287 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 29.4 24% 29.8 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 51.2 32% 37.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 418GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 825 846 868 857 825 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 715 Write 833 Mixed 736 SusWrite 848 177% 783 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 29.3 96% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 448 DQ Write 377 DQ Mixed 417 311% 414 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 181%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 142 139 141 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 128 Write 139 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 139 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB 21,753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.2% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 291 14% 291 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	492x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	300x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16